Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Apple Store - Sydney

Last week I was working in Sydney and had the opportunity to visit the new Sydney Apple store, the first of its kind in Australia.



There were three floors of Apple, Apple, Apple with the lots of products to try.



The first floor was the full range of notebooks with every model available to ty or test. There were also several i-Macs and gaming stations.


The second floor was portable devices and every type of ipod was available to try.
The third and top floor has several dedicated training areas where you can book a one on one personal training session. Near by is the pro lab where you can join a 4 week class on specialist programs such as final cut pro.
There is also a genius bench where you can bring your apple product in and have a specialist work through any problems or functions you are having problems with. Time is restricted to about 20 minute maximum and again you can pre-book a genius on line.
All of these can be booked online.
Another feature is Youth workshops and you can also book a school night for students, teachers and parents.
More information on the Apple Sydney store web site.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Star Trek and the collective

Have you ever watched StarTrek? Many of us who have a passion for ICT used to thrive on the latest gadgets and what our future might be. It was always the unknown and I guess much of it is coming true.

Many of the StarTrek ideas have become reality. The notebook computer, lasers, the universal translators is almost complete and I have to say the hollo deck is not far from the Wii.

So after a month of non posting on blogger, what made me find time to talk about StarTrek? Well it’s actually Twitter that I want to talk about as I have been following a number of educators who are having the debate, where would Twitter fit into education. I am a sceptic and have yet to be convinced, even after following someone like Steve Whitaker for some time. I now know what TV shows he watches, the food he eats and what he does when he is bored. Hardly educational. I have watched my friend Kathy Schrock grapple with the education use of Twitter as well, while Will Richardson and David Warlick are heavy users and sing it’s praises.

This week I was presenting at the ICTEV conference and in my second session on “The World of Google”, I had several delegates, who much to my amusement seemed more focused on Twitter than my talk.
On closer observation I realised that they were actually very engaged in what was happening in the room and had a very strong network of friends Australia wide who were also technology and education enthusiasts. For many of this network of friends, Melbourne was too far to travel to attend a one day conference, so they linked up, real time using Twitter.

So my workshop was full with 25 participants, however another 20 or more were all over Australia, actively connecting to each hyperlink or web site I mentioned and just as involved and engaged as those in the room. In many cases they asked questions which were redirected by their friends in the room to me. All using Twitter.

I thought to myself. This is just like the collective in StarTrek. It’s how the Borg worked. They were connected at all times, no matter where they were.

So Twitter now has my tick of approval. I have two new followers in Jo and Sheila and I will have to post more often. www.twitter.com/ausgreg

I guess this is also why kids are so drawn to new technologies. They like to be connected at all times. Why are kids so connected and the users in my session using Twitter? Because they have built networks to assist and learn from each other and they value their network members, the conversations, the communication and friendship this brings.

So why do we not have this in all our classrooms?

Monday, April 7, 2008

Healthy Education

This week I was fortunate to be invited as one of the keynote speakers for the Blackboards and Bandaids conference in Brisbane. The conference is attended by welfare educators and has a range of Health and well being presenters on a variety of topics.
The Mater Children’s Hospital have conducted the conference for the past four years as part of the Mater Children Hospital School program.

I was privileged to have a short tour of the school after my keynote and workshop and visited classrooms for junior, middle and senior students. Computers are a big part of their education and the classrooms look similar to those in a normal school, only smaller for less numbers. Some students are short term, however for some; their illness necessitates a long stay. In many cases classes are conducted in the wards as some children are not well enough to leave their beds.

As I passed the emergency waiting room it was sad to see so many young children waiting to be seen by doctors, with anxious parents beside them. It made me reflect how lucky many families are to have healthy children but more important, what a wonderful job this hospital based school does. It means that most children at the hospital can feel that part of their life is still normal and that they are part of a school community, which for young children who are dealing with an illness is a very important to their coping mechanism.

Spare a thought for another wonderful part of education that we don’t often get to see.

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Changing classrooms in new Zealand

This week I returned to New Zealand to deliver the keynote address at the Mana-Ota-Tikei ICT Cluster conference held at Manawatu College in Foxton.

The cluster has four secondary schools who are part of a technology initiative to increase and enhance the use of technology in their schools. Allan Webb is the program co-ordinator and coaching facilitator as well as being the conference organiser for this cluster. I have to thank Allan for his hospitality on my trip as well as attention to detail to ensure the conference went well. It was a pleasure to work with him.

There was a good use of technology throughout the cluster and I found most of the teachers found the keynote full of exciting possibilities. A few may have been confronted, however as I explained during the keynote, this is a smorgasbord of technology being shown and the task at hand is to find the one that can enhance teaching and learning in their own classroom. For some, I think they found four of five things.

The day before the conference, I ran a full day workshop on podcasting and digital storytelling. It was a great group of teachers and it didn’t take long before they were all producing professional podcasts.

Attending the conference was Margaret McLeod and Angela Page from Core Education Ltd. Core is involved education research and development and are responsible for organising a lot of the professional learning programs in schools in new Zealand.

During dinner we were chatting about technology and how New Zealand often looked to the state of Victoria in Australia as the bench mark for innovation in Technology as a system.
I can see why. They have provided every teacher in state schools with a laptop for over 9 years now, which are replaced every three years, they have provided all Microsoft applications free to all schools, they have installed wireless to every classroom for teacher laptops, placed computer technicians in every school, installed a centralised administration system to all schools, and now high speed internet access to all schools. Coming soon is Ultranet, a state-wide learning management and document management system that will be provide central access, school access, teacher access, parent and student access. To assist this major implementation they have employed 50 Ultranet coaches.

But what I see missing and what New Zealand has done very well is teacher professional development in ICT. In Victoria, the ICT delivery is left to subject associations or internal training at schools. It is many years since the department ran a state conference and the few regions that run ICT conferences have optional attendance, with only the converted attending. Providing teachers and schools with resources is important, however if we don’t work with teachers to assist them with the pedagogical change that facilitates learning with new technologies, then not much will happen in the classrooms.

New Zealand has provided clusters with 3 year grants to run whole school (cluster) based professional learning using ICT as well as providing funds to employ staff to work as peer mentors and coaches in schools. Allan Webb, the conference co-ordinator works in 3 schools, rotating through each school and provide school wide support as well as one-on-one assistance. It’s the personal one-on-one where Allan sees the greatest gains. The conferences and workshops provide teachers with the vision and inspiration to use the technology, however the making it happen stuff really works because they have the follow up support with people like Allan in each cluster.

Australia might have more individual innovators because they have access to the technology, but I think New Zealand are further down the track in relation to real change in the classroom as a whole.

Having fun in Animoto - Click to find out more

How webciting!!!

Friday, March 21, 2008

ICT in Marlborough, New Zealand

ICT is alive and well in New Zealand. I have just spent two delightful days working with educators in Blenheim as part of the Marlborough Technology in Education Cluster. The cluster is made up of staff from two schools, Marlborough Girls College and Marlborough Boys College.
The two schools had a Teacher Only Day (TOD) to enhance the use of technology. What I found interesting was that many of the workshops on the PD day focused around technologies that children use in every-day life. For many teachers it was a chance to understand and try these technologies. While some of the session involved the use of Learning Objects, Inspiration and other classroom related software there was a strong focus on student technology.

One session focused on cell phones and learning how student text with cell phones, how to use calendars, upload images etc using the cell phone. Another focused on Flickr and how to put photos on line, while the use of iPods’ and how to find and download music was also a feature.
Teachers also had the chance to learn about Skype and how to communicate with family and friends using this low cost or free resource.
There was certainly a buzz around the schools, who jointly hosted sessions. Lunch was at the girls college and the opening keynote and closing drinks at the boy’s college, ensuring that there was no bias for locations.

The evening before over 40 educators turned up to a pre conference workshop that I delivered on the “World of Google” There was significant interest on how the different applications could be used in classrooms.

On the PD day, I delivered a keynote called “Webciting – What all the hype about web 2.0”. This was a chance to inform educators about the shift from web 1.0 to web 2.0 as well as share a range of new technologies being used in education. I followed this with reference to professional learning for educators and how the model is changing and then finished with some international research and of course some "wow" factor with some of the technologies of the future.
My first workshop focused on digital storytelling and it was great to see how excited many of the staff were who had not used this process before. Of particular note was the PE staff who are going to change the face of theory lessons with a whole range of multimedia. My second session was on web 2.0 tools, toonadoo, bubbl.us, freewebs, igoogle and more. Again there was a buzz in the room and at the end of the day, when all other sessions had finished, my group wanted to keep going. How webciting!

I also have to thank my hosts Sandy and Giles, who co-ordinated the conference from their respective schools. They were fantastic and the hospitality and the offers to go out of their way to look after me where greatly appreciated. From bbq dinners and take away, to chauffeuring me to and from the airport and school. Nothing was too much trouble, even though they had the weight of organising the event on their shoulders. Thank you.


So where are they headed. Certainly there was a good level of understanding of technology by teachers. There are the usual number of champions that I see in schools, however there was a far greater general ICT awareness and skill level as a whole staff, than in general.



With Sandy and Giles leading the way, I will expect to see some great educational outcomes coming from this school district.



(Photo: Blenheim District as my plane departed)



Sunday, February 3, 2008

Classrooms of the Future

I was just reading an article on Schools of the Future and thought I had to have my say.

Classrooms of the future. How many forums have I been on to discuss this? We need classrooms with access to technology, flexible usage, maybe open plans, modular to allow for the unknown.
What I do see is that children will learn anywhere provided they are motivated and engaged. If we look at technology, for those children with access, learning happens 24/7. There are no classrooms to teach how to upload to Youtube, how to build the best myspace page, yet children lean. They learn through their own networks and being connected.
I think what is sometimes the issue is that we need to teach some of the key foundations in English and Mathematics and to do this we need two learning models. One which has a more open learning mode such as project work which may be based in a non traditional classroom setting, with a focus on challenging the thinking of children; however the other is still traditional in many ways as children need structure, especially around the 11 to 14 yr age group.
They need teacher guidance and need to have structure so that the basics they learn can be used in everyday life and form the basic structures for different types of learning. They need access to a teacher who has a personal interest and not in an open plan room with 100 or so other students. They have individual needs and need a strong structure in place relating to their personal learning. And while children are connected all the time, and I love technology, we have to remember there are times when learning is not done on an ipod, laptop or technology device.
Let’s build schools that allow innovation and learning to take place in many different ways, but let’s also remember we have to also teach key competencies and skills that are age appropriate each year. Schools of tomorrow should have options for learning, traditional and non traditional, however we need to try to understand what belongs in which. I still think the key is not the school of the future, but the teacher of the future.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Computers for all yr 9 ,10, 11,and 12 students in Australia

The new Federal Government in Australia have promised to provide a computer for every year 9, 10, 11 and 12 students in schools throughout Australia. This is part of a plan to make Australia the clever country and to ensure students have access to 21st century tools.
These students who are already living with 21st century technology will now have even greater access in schools. However this is not an easy process to put in place and has many barriers that need to be worked through. Almost all of these barriers are achievable but they will require a cost as the support, infrastructure and teaching and learning requirements are not a quick fix.

The idea is to be commended as we know from most technology conferences that one on one computing is seen as the best model for the use of technology. Shared computers have a place, however this is usually for collaborative work, and while we are encouraging this in schools, students still need personalised learning.
It is still unclear how the Governments model will work, however I believe it is different to the notebook programs that are in so many private schools.

Why does the notebook program work so well in private schools?

  • Students have ownership of the technology
  • The school controls the notebook image that is rolled out. This also ensure greater control over legal software
  • Parents pay a higher premium to ensure they notebooks have extended warranties and insurance
  • Schools have additional technical support resources for repairs and notebooks servicing and rollouts

So how will a notebook for each student in state schools and non notebook schools work?
Putting a desktop in every classroom is impossible. Classrooms are not big enough and have not been designed for this purpose, so I think this is out.
Notebooks are the only way, however my understanding is that the computers will be schools based and not for home usage. This will control much of the copyright and illegal software issues.

However the first issue will be technical support. A high school of 1,000 students with a ratio of 1 to 5 computers will current have 200 computers and one to two EFT (Equivalent Full Time) technical support people. Pluse 80 staff laptops.
With the new model, we could expect a school to have 720 computers, 1 for every yr 9, 10, 11 and 12 (approximately 650 computers) and a ratio of 1 to 5 for year 7 and 8 (70 computers) plus 80 staff laptops. This would require an additional 2 to 4 technician per school.

Perhaps a preloaded national image for every machine may be a solution, which would have to have a Novell, Windows and Lynx build as well as a negotiated national license for software. This may reduce technical support, however it may not work where schools want to customise computer images. Each state and education sector also has different requirements for student use. (e.g. Ultranet in Victoria)


Next we will have to invest in teacher professional development. While we know many teachers are using technology, not many have had classes where every student in every class has access to a notebook. This will require some pedagogical change for many teachers, and while some may have trained in how to use technology, always connected in the classroom is very different.

Infrastructure is the other cost. Internet connection and network connectivity, power for notebooks, additional costs of internet usage, additional printers etc.
We need to find a model that does not charge schools to connect or use the internet. Australia is one of the few countries where internet is not free to schools.

Additional printers may be met by school funds, however it is the hard wiring that has the greatest cost. How do we enable electricity and internet in all classes?

On a recent international study tour, I saw a system that worked extremely well in this area. It also reduced technical support needs as well. It has a high set up cost, however it did provide significant savings long term.
It involved the use of notebook lockers in schools. Students put their notebooks into these lockers each evening and at lunch time, where they were connected to electricity and the school network. A radio frequency disk on a key ring or lanyard was used by students to open their lockers.
Students would connect the notebook in their lockers to electricity overnight which would charge the notebook with enough electricity to run the first 4 hours of the day. At lunch time they would put the notebooks back into the lockers where they would be semi recharged with enough electricity to finish the last 2 hours of the day. In the evening the notebooks were connected to the network and in sleep mode, with lids closed, they could be woken up for software and virus updates, patches and images could be installed. In some cases notebooks were reimaged at night, leaving a student partition untouched which contained student work.


The locker system would detect when notebooks were in lockers and provide a report at the end of the day on any student notebooks that were not returned. These students would lose access to their notebook long term, which deterred students from not following the school policy.


This system provided a cable free school for notebooks, with all network access via wireless and electricity provided through twice daily recharges.


The costs would be high to start with as lockers, electricity, network access and security would have to be funded in the initial build, along with an extended wireless network, however the saving would be significant long term with classrooms requiring little change apart from wireless points and technical support/images/damages reduced due to the locker system and the control the school has over the technology.

Food for thought and Interesting times!!!!!!!!!!!!!!